Jump to content


More nurses press charges against violent patients


2 replies to this topic

Poll: Attack left nurse at risk for HIV (6 member(s) have cast votes)

SHOULD MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HAVE THE RIGHT TO PRESS CHARGES AGAINST PATIENTS

  1. YES (5 votes [83.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 83.33%

  2. NO (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. UNDECIDED (1 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 NawlinsGirl

    Registered Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:SAN FRANCISCO

Posted 20 June 2007 - 03:42 AM

By Jessica Fargen
Boston Herald Health & Medical Reporter
Monday, June 11, 2007 - Updated: 06:42 AM EST

One second, ER nurse Ellen MacInnis was inserting an IV into the arm of a drunken, HIV-positive patient. The next second, she was tasting the woman’s blood in her mouth.
“I opened my eyes, and all I could see was red blood,” said MacInnis, a 47-year-old Caritas St. Elizabeth’s Hospital nurse who was exposed to HIV and hepatitis C when the patient swung at her from a hospital bed in July, dislodging the IV and splashing blood everywhere. “It was just spewing out.”
MacInnis, like several nurses interviewed for this story, pressed charges against her patient, something that nursing experts said was uncommon even 10 years ago but has become necessary for frontline caregivers dealing with an increasingly violent and addicted population.

http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional...ticleid=1005826

ONCE YOU READ THE ARTICLE PLEASE ANSWER THE POLL AND ELABORATE ON YOUR ANSWER.


THANKS,

NAWLINSGIRL rolleyes.gif
Success stems from hard work, devotion, and the ability to learn from one's mistakes.

#2 blazes49

    Registered Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 26 June 2007 - 06:37 PM

Some particular disease processes make people unpredictable in behaviour that quite often wasn't their original demeanor before the disease took hold. I do understand that if it is a patient that is just behaviourally "naughty" especially drug users/abusers and drunks, etc. but maybe we need to take further precautions too, as these types of patients aren't going to change due to a lawsuit (generally because they have most likely already been in trouble before- and I know I'm generalising here) so if people have a known disease like HIV, AIds, hep c, etc then we need to be wearing masks, etc. I know it doesn't stop us from being hit, but it will help with contracting an unwanted lethal disease! unsure.gif

#3 NawlinsGirl

    Registered Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:SAN FRANCISCO

Posted 27 June 2007 - 12:32 AM

HI,

I AGREE THAT WE SHOULD TAKE ALL THE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT OURSELVES BUT WE ALL KNOW SOMETIMES THAT JUST ISNT ENOUGH. I REALIZE THAT SOME PATIENTS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, BUT SOME ARE. THOSE ARE THE ONES I FEEL SHOULD BE PROSECUTED FOR THEIR ACTIONS. rolleyes.gif
Success stems from hard work, devotion, and the ability to learn from one's mistakes.




Reply to this topic



  


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users